After the less than inspirational efforts Diamond Creek has produced since 1985, the three cuvees of 1992 Cabernet Sauvignon exhibit better richness, excellent purity, and deep ruby/purple colors. Nevertheless, for longtime fans of Diamond Creek Cabernet, weaned on the blockbuster, rich, occasionally rustic, but always individualistic and distinctive as well as super-complex and concentrated wines of the seventies and early eighties, there has clearly been a radical change in style. Although the wines may be more elegant and consistent, they are also less interesting. That is not to say they are not good, but anyone who has tasted Diamond Creek Cabernet Sauvignon from 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, or 1978, as well as vintages through the early eighties, knows that when mature these wines are riveting examples of California Cabernet Sauvignon. There now appears to be an emphasis on a more sculptured, elegant style.Richer than the 1992 Gravelly Meadow, the 1992 Cabernet Sauvignon Volcanic Hill is extremely tannic and backward. It should easily merit a score in the upper eighties when fully mature in 10-12 years. There is impressive, pure cassis fruit, medium body, and gobs of tannin in the finish. Do not touch a bottle for at least 7-8 years as it is one of the most backward 1992s.All of Diamond Creek's offerings should turn out to be very fine Cabernet Sauvignons with at least two decades of aging potential. However, the move toward a more stylish, elegant, and refined Cabernet Sauvignon appears to have condemned Diamond Creek to following the pack. While they are very good, well-made wines, I lament the fact that they have so little in common with the Diamond Creek Cabernet Sauvignons made between 1974-1984.

Despite its dark color, this comes across as a bit one-dimensional, with candied cherry, dry herb and earthy-anise flavors that are appealing if lacking in focus and complexity.--'92 California Cabernet retrospective. Drink now through 2006. 1,400 cases made.